The Problem of Supporting Richardson for President
By J. Grant Swank Jr. (06/12/07)
Finally.
Finally there is a realistic, level head calling for removal of troops from Iraq’s civil war.
Naysayers proclaim that all hell will break loose if that happens. Not so. Not so at least on the scale as the naysayers put it. All hell will break loose in Iraq. But it’s already there. It will only get worse as it gets worse in Gaza.
Muslim killers live to up their carnage. That won’t stop. But US men and women in uniform should never be called to referee such a civil conflict in the name of patriotism or democracy planting.
Democracy plants don’t happen when blood is spilled into earth in place of freedom’s blossoming seeds.
Muslim killers live by the Koran creed of killing of infidels and Muslim cowards who refuse to enter into the fray. That is a demonic religious zeal that won’t stop. Check any cult to see if it has a conclusion to it. It doesn’t it. So the same with the cult known as "Islam."
Therefore, when Bill Richardson calls for immediate withdrawal >from Iraq, he’s seen the light most clearly, more so than any others seeking the Oval Office. Then put Richardson in the driver’s seat. Not any too soon.
Per AP, Richardson, the Democratic presidential hopeful, informed media that "he wanted a total withdrawal of US forces in Iraq and that American troops are targets in a civil war."
Like, dah!
How is this so difficult a concept to get hold of? It’s beyond me.
President Bush under the title of Operation Iraqi Freedom opened up the Islamic killing machine that has been kept a secret to most of the Western world. Now gradually, ever so slowly, the Western mind is coming to grips with the Koran killing and maiming verses, taking them seriously.
Operation Iraqi Freedom, with good intentions, was a grave mistake. It then should be halted. It should have been halted long ago.
Therefore with Richardson coming to the fore with his convictions, America should grab hold of his black-and-white leadership.
"’I would leave no troops in Iraq whatsoever,’ Richardson said. ‘The difference between me and the other candidates is, they would leave troops there indefinitely, and I would not.’"
I take him at his word. It’s a word that should have been written across the skies many months ago.
There is a real problem, however, when endorsing Richardson. He's PRO-CHOICE and PRO-HOMOSEXUAL lifestyle.
Not good.
(Printer friendly version) Email: J. Grant Swank Jr.
